Recently, Hachette Book Group announced its plans for an enriched eBook of David Baldacci’s Deliver Us from Evil. As Jason Boog of GalleyCat writes in his article, it certainly seems to promise an “enriching” reading experience. To me, it sounds a lot like a special edition DVD, with behind-the-scenes video, deleted content, and other windows into the creative process.

After perusing some author websites, it occurred to me that the enriched eBook really is a promising idea. For those who are interested in how their favorite author crafts his tales, the EE will be able to include, say, audio Q and A, or video of the author’s office, or scans of story outlines and the like. For the curious/voracious reader, deleted passages from the manuscript could be included to provide more insider info on characters, lost subplots, or even, as in the case of the Baldacci EE, alternate endings.

All told, this seems to enable a slightly more active reading experience (at least in some ways) without being invasive. The special features can be looked at when the reader decides to look at them (and turned off/ignored when the reader doesn't). For example, let’s say you’re reading a new thriller EE, with supplementary images of exotic terrain and fancy new vehicles. You can choose to have a look at the Gobi Desert while you’re reading (so you know what it looks like), or after you’ve finished the book (so you’re not interfering with what you’re imagining).

From a social point of view, I think this also signals a move in an intriguing direction – a direction in which our reading and our conversations about reading are merging together. With EEs like Baldacci’s we can immediately learn what the author thinks of his novel, how it compares to his vision, and how he may want the reader to approach it. Perhaps someday, what with the imminent popularity of all-in-one devices like the iPad, our e-reading experience will incorporate IMs/texting (presumably about the writing) while reading. Which makes me wonder, is that a good thing or a bad thing?

~Marjorie DeWitt

Yesterday (March 17), Sheena Iyengar was featured in a delightful article in the “Home” section of the New York Times. In the article, we learn a bit more about how Sheena, an expert on choice and author of this month’s The Art of Choosing, makes choices in her own life.

“We’re born with the desire, but we don’t really know how to choose,’ [Sheena] said. ‘We don’t know what our taste is, and we don’t know what we are seeing. I’m a great believer in the idea of not choosing based on our taste. I could wear makeup today, and one person would say it looks bland, another would say it looks fake, and another might tell me I look really natural. Everyone is convinced their opinion is the truth, and that’s what I struggle against. But doesn’t everyone? What I do is aim for consensus. That’s my rule of how to choose.”

In addition to the need for consensus that Sheena suggests above, the article also discusses how paralyzing too many choices can be, how simply having a choice can make us happier, and the best way to approach buying furniture for your own home.

~Marjorie DeWitt

Awards abound! Congratulations this week go to Dave Cullen – his book, Columbine has been named the 2009 Discover Great Writers Award winner in Nonfiction. Columbine is also a finalist for the Los Angeles Times Book Prize.

In other Cullen news, Dave posted an essay on The Daily Beast from the Afterword to the paperback edition of Columbine revealing the secret meeting of Eric Harris' parents with his victims' kin—offering a rare glimpse into how they saw their son. It’s truly a heart wrenching and perplexing read.

~Marjorie DeWitt